Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: elns Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl Subject: Re: Performance problems with "photo copy -to" Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:44:49 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 23:44:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50a87819e9d5ddccfaae2f0cbbd32443"; logging-data="2996042"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+gNCFaRpEDTiLlzYAvmi5KrK1jPqqEI1c=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q6gFWwPkhVOCSXANGU2a8wvNzXU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: nl Bytes: 2157 On 11/7/24 21:43, Paul Obermeier wrote: > > Can anybody confirm my measurements? > Using Tcl 8.6.15, Tk 8.6.15 Time for 100 copies: 1.31 seconds ( 13 milliseconds / copy) Time for 400 copies: 20.32 seconds ( 50 milliseconds / copy) Time for 900 copies: 102.27 seconds (113 milliseconds / copy) Using Tcl 9.0.0, Tk 9.0.0 Time for 100 copies: 1.17 seconds ( 11 milliseconds / copy) Time for 400 copies: 16.84 seconds ( 42 milliseconds / copy) Time for 900 copies: 84.76 seconds ( 94 milliseconds / copy) So, I see a performance increase with Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 instead of a decrease. B.t.w.: - Having replaced in your script [package version Tk] with $tk_patchLevel to prevent that multiple installed Tk versions are reported. - The combination Tcl8.7 and Tk9 is not avaiable to me - Did you perhaps use different compiler optimizations for your builds? (My builds are all without compiler optimizations.) Regards, Erik Leunissen -- elns@ nl | Merge the left part of these two lines into one, xs4all. | respecting a character's position in a line.