Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: 10 Jan 2025 22:15:32 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <ludkg3Fcu8aU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me> <ltmbcmFjcgpU1@mid.individual.net>
	<ba6263f8-1e7f-5eb1-ae06-757f2ed7a018@example.net>
	<lto9qbFso18U3@mid.individual.net>
	<slrnvnegk1.2cl6d.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com>
	<8b262a1f-507f-ef10-e4d3-a981dca5b7d1@example.net>
	<vl8jdq$3st6d$1@dont-email.me> <vl8jul$3sqfa$4@dont-email.me>
	<vl8otk$3splv$3@dont-email.me> <vl8qm7$3u6t2$1@dont-email.me>
	<vl93dl$3vkun$1@dont-email.me> <vl9449$3vo6h$3@dont-email.me>
	<vl9aov$pp7$1@dont-email.me> <vla4hr$5n4v$1@dont-email.me>
	<vlblqj$harb$1@dont-email.me> <lttopaFoh2cU8@mid.individual.net>
	<vle8uk$12sii$2@dont-email.me>
	<c686fb74-4fac-0809-7005-417c76ee0e3b@example.net>
	<nbReP.633803$oR74.271654@fx16.iad>
	<2e17ec15-582f-5a71-84e5-d4d490274270@example.net>
	<vlj20k$25740$9@dont-email.me>
	<7454fa51-3534-2584-2197-90613efb2091@example.net>
	<XPSdnbpbLvJvxeL6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vloss6$3e1r9$5@dont-email.me> <vlp4pc$3fpg0$7@dont-email.me>
	<vlpc44$3h48e$4@dont-email.me> <vlqi4a$3sp5m$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net ltiGxv/U7S8ozkxWyaolqAYXyI24muLs+ssozm4ECWZgh+9LpO
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gw6sMi7nL0lcsPRhuf5BHb/13Uc= sha256:ANPOXMNz5I/nXjt8xRsbAd6rJ/RmDWmITAZx5cBfOew=
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Bytes: 2107

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 07:27:06 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> The natural tendency in a free market is that the best technology rises
> to the top, becomes ubiquitous, and everybody uses it. Diversity in
> technology is not desirable,. Diversity in its application is, somewhat.

Like natural selection I would say an adequate technology rises to the 
top, not always the best.