Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Date: 2 Jan 2025 19:42:31 GMT Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <441smjp44l5o2ja4c1vlsv32oh2j6m9n4j@4ax.com> <3co24lx2vn.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net xi13yMQjgO36RUVZXi8DtggiMwo4PVAYh1z3jBKGTtDPfmJmqB Cancel-Lock: sha1:HklMQb3qs+O1bTxO6fsr5QmOEw4= sha256:l81mIfoZo1JRRgpMEtea96M121U8QgdJ2pN5pWJqf4w= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 1990 On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:36:41 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: > I find GNOME rather clunky whereas KDE, at least on Fedora and Nobara, > is perfect out of the box. I imagine that a lot of people who try out > Linux and face GNOME are going to wonder how to do the basics, and they > will likely find that the way extensions work is rather clunky, > especially during upgrades. Meanwhile, KDE is very familiar and offers a > ton of features they could only dream of in Windows like the desktop > effects, theming options and widgets. Unlike Cinnamon too, the widgets > in KDE actually work as they should. The Ubuntu box has GNOME. I live with it but I'm not a fan. I'd rather have a menu structure rather than the 'Show Applications' button that brings up three or four screens of unsorted stuff.