From: Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks>
Subject: Re: Anyone Using OpenZFS?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <pan$cc206$666a7ee5$9c599643$77173a6a@linux.rocks> <vlrv05$22rn$1@dont-email.me> <pan$deac4$90d03d3d$f254895b$4b89b1ae@linux.rocks> <vls0dt$22rn$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <pan$702f0$c4554836$cd49f73b$97cc73de@linux.rocks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 19
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:00:04 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:00:04 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1122
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Bytes: 1456

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:37:17 -0500, Phillip wrote:

> 
> Probably not without having specific requirements that leverage the ZFS 
> file system. For example, I use it on a small server to handle RAID1+5 
> for a business with 10 employees. At home I have no need for that so 
> EXT4 is the better option for my needs at home.
>

OK.  Thanks.

I was just curious but I'll stick with EXT4.





-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.