Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.philosophy
Subject: Re: On the indignity of flying.
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:32:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <vm40q8$21p2p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <2395b02c-4e69-ee05-bdb0-6da5457f1634@example.net> <cnmf5lxseh.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <0e4b858d-76d7-a8a5-08bf-cbd4ff979f67@example.net>
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:32:57 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3ab08ed4ccf63e85b770c7568c84042c";
	logging-data="2155609"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196tCLfHTp1zKMnUhgcMZvF"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FaSVWq047+EJOnjMwzKspBvx1pk=
Bytes: 1328

In comp.os.linux.misc D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> If I had my own private jet, and my own airport, I might reconsider.

If you had a private jet, you don't need your own airport.  "private 
jet" owners use the "not available to mere peons" "executive entrance" 
and bypass the entire cattle ranch indignity of the insides of all 
airports.