Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:13:58 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <vjh4tm$3btea$10@dont-email.me>
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me>
 <aS2dnU8NvNJ3qsj6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lrl33gF2rglU1@mid.individual.net>
 <9eb45192-e996-fa3d-b002-c02798bb2b7a@example.net>
 <lrmmorFb62qU1@mid.individual.net> <7Gq5P.102876$7FA3.79818@fx13.iad>
 <5d39f504-e3f6-3830-a9fc-fc79cf7fc557@example.net>
 <vj6pc9$ctrb$12@dont-email.me>
 <992330af-c771-9db3-7d20-deb5e0cb882d@example.net>
 <vj9os3$10sqc$13@dont-email.me>
 <7896d790-e533-a390-b024-abc1edcd1c15@example.net>
 <vjaib9$16171$2@dont-email.me>
 <253549be-ac18-daa7-6b9a-a3b41e3e91e7@example.net>
 <vjbq25$1g5t2$3@dont-email.me>
 <54acad70-d817-060f-5378-304258c3a1f0@example.net>
 <vjcffr$1k27r$2@dont-email.me>
 <d3f42cea-362a-834c-50e5-5fcbdb404cda@example.net>
 <vjee53$23087$2@dont-email.me> <ls119jFru0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <b9dbd370-dc9a-91a0-ed8e-affd6745d901@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:13:59 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7945d33c13c695c1e45039fc75820edc";
	logging-data="3536330"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MDRwvTrfonNTtkJuxw8dDzyyxK5Y5zOQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8rsIU9yynSuvynV+UHNZlOFEKq4=
In-Reply-To: <b9dbd370-dc9a-91a0-ed8e-affd6745d901@example.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2880

On 13/12/2024 10:08, D wrote:
>
> 
> Are there any techniques to resupply a sub completely under water? Would 
> be fascinating if it could be managed and resupplied kind of like a 
> space station with rotating crews and all, being sent in smaller 
> submarines docking at the big one.
> 
Iyts technically totally feasible, but I cannot actually see what the 
point would be.

> On the other hand, there's probably no use for that capability, but its 
> an interesting thought experiment to see if it could then remain 
> submerged for years at a time.

What is the current record?

"The Royal Navy's HMS Vengeance holds the record for the longest 
deployment of a "doomsday" submarine, spending 201 days underwater. This 
broke the previous record of 195 days set by HMS Vigilant."

The USA shuts its mouth...who knows?

-- 
The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before 
its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

Anon.