Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Tragedy Strikes BLM Founder Patrice Cullors
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:35:03 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vmcj58$3t101$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vmbms6$3ks1e$1@dont-email.me> <vmbte5$3lsnb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vmc9a3$3nv5i$1@dont-email.me>
 <super70s-3597D7.20224516012025@reader.eternal-september.org>
 <vmcg26$3orv7$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 04:35:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="432983cfacdab31f3620ddd7aed654c0";
	logging-data="4097025"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BcwwpVgkzfpiTmHtu5+MdqDWoiVvpaAo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dICN1o4WwigY6mFhh26zvhi1TGE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vmcg26$3orv7$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2322

On 1/16/2025 9:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2025 at 6:22:45 PM PST, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> In article <vmc9a3$3nv5i$1@dont-email.me>, Alan Smithee <alms@last.inc>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>   On 2025-01-16 05:24 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>   > On 1/16/2025 2:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   >> https://ibb.co/zhSnMwx
>>>   >>
>>>   >> "BLM Founder and self-described Marxist Patrisse Cullors suffered a
>>>   >> double tragedy when two of her three Los Angeles mansions were consumed
>>>   >> by the recent wildfires."
>>>   >>
>>>   >> Of course it never occurs to ABC to wonder why Cullors had three
>>>   >> mansions in
>>>   >> the first place and where the money came from for her to buy them.
>>>   
>>>   > The headline is more than innuendo enough for any half-awake reader.
>>>   
>>>   Dated - Jan. 10, 2024. Nothing to do with current events.
>>
>> It was still too tempting for him to pass up.
> 
> Is there some unwritten rule that anything that's more than 48 hours old
> somehow 'doesn't count'?

Were you aware the headline was a year old?  I wasn't.