Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Use of { and } was Re: Back & Forth - Co-routines Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 07:39:26 GMT Organization: Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien Lines: 17 Message-ID: <2025Feb2.083926@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> References: <2025Feb1.085049@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <8a9dfb4cf6ab113a0e97a7f3eb4ff4ceccbcd7b6@i2pn2.org> Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 08:44:16 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0d8ba63a863aedce302b0b45b92c591"; logging-data="627664"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+d9D32wfcSLRl55WMnQE55" Cancel-Lock: sha1:jkRAWPo8BJTKmbXRLzqoRDGTwNE= X-newsreader: xrn 10.11 Bytes: 1922 dxf writes: >On 1/02/2025 11:14 pm, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote: >> { } is used for comment in Pascal. > >That's interesting. When did that come in, and why, given the issues? Good question. My memory is only of (* *), but indeed Section 6.1.8 of https://www.standardpascal.org/iso7185.pdf makes it clear that (* and { can be used interchangeably, as well as *) and }. - anton -- M. Anton Ertl http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html New standard: https://forth-standard.org/ EuroForth 2023 proceedings: http://www.euroforth.org/ef23/papers/ EuroForth 2024 proceedings: http://www.euroforth.org/ef24/papers/