Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "badgolferman" Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: How to switch off Apple Intelligence on the iPhone, iPad & Mac Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 22:40:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:40:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a3abf866aeffa5e864de5acec3ffa84e"; logging-data="2138385"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ksv86ijAtGIW2s4M6MJrx+OjccS4cK3s=" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.372 (x86; Portable ISpell) Cancel-Lock: sha1:p4+SpTplNnxSlNIlRgMyuCV0w+0= X-Ref: reader443.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00002D5D X-Face: 09>j%-W3HnyolA\I${DXfUw}~nKyLDiU8IwUVM'` Bytes: 3310 Marion wrote: >On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:18:16 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote : > > >>If this is really what they are trying to do I hope they succeed. >>Just so long as they don't switch over to the Chinese DeepSeek AI >>which blatantly tells users all their personal information is going >>to the Chinese government. > >Unfortunately, Apple merely copies innovation & remarkets it at huge >prices sustained by (admittedly brilliant) slick advertising for the >hoi polloi. > >However... >Like you, I also hope that Apple succeeds in copying the existing AI >innovation to the point that it's a worthy competitor, just like Apple >Maps. The more competition, the better, as I end up getting better >stuff. > >The good news is Apple makes so much profit off it's product line >that it can afford the immense outlay in costs to catch up (even >though by virtually all accounts, Apple is two years behind Google in >AI technology). > >Notice though, that Apple is behind others in almost all high >technology. For example, how many years behind Qualcomm is Apple in >5G integration? > >I get it that the Apple trolls hate all Apple can do is copy high >tech, much like China does, and then Apple resells those copies at >huge profits. > >But if the Apple trolls want to dispute that - all they'd need to do >is tell us what high technology Apple leads in (and no, Emojiis don't >count). > >Neither does Apple's fantastic ability to name all those bold new >colors! What high tech is Apple actually good at? > >Note: I'm sure the Apple trolls will mention CPUs, but it turns out >Apple is no good at CPU development (and Apple even stopped making >GPUs). The reason Apple makes their own iPhone CPU is for purely >marketing reasons. How about trackers and ear buds? The Apple branded ones are pretty good.