Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: My Hate List (Revised) Date: 11 Feb 2025 02:10:38 GMT Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <5p5aqjtifqicrulfmm3fn66495is03ku24@4ax.com> <53jaqj5lt1a126ibbqr6h7rrrc85sesuf5@4ax.com> <331cqjtublaatb84g88ob6vsatp8ckphag@4ax.com> <8mafqjhpoa05guopst82dv8io8m1oh9ihe@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 58UbAKLsc9Ch14fvpdM7RQfPl5N5OSZOp4csxtbENDgBwCkNcw Cancel-Lock: sha1:7Myoe7NDCz2lh1IngUNEZ/ZLnfI= sha256:9k1Kti18pm2gaYk9xF3hQWAjsqViaErtwN3QtrlTTyI= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Bytes: 1849 On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:46:46 -0600, chrisv wrote: > If "4k" isn't sharp, something is lacking with either the source or > what's being done with it. For your eyes to be able to resolve all of > the details in a true 4k image, you need to be about four feet from a > 65" display! Even with the transition from VHS to DVD I realized I didn't need to see every bead of sweat on Christy Moore's forehead. I've noticed many recent productions tend to be dark. (visually, not thematically). I think this may be a decision to keep the ambient lighting low enough that the crappy work on the sets doesn't stand out in 4k.