Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.killfile.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: *Hemidactylus* Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Two more California Dairy workers confirmed to be H5N1 infected Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:10:37 +0000 Organization: University of Ediacara Lines: 90 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="72869"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY= Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 2574A229782; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:10:48 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DE6229765 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 19:10:45 -0500 (EST) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTP id 4B40AeXS1514539 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 01:10:42 +0100 by egress-mx.phmgmt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD69611F6 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 00:10:28 +0000 (UTC) by serv-4.ord.giganews.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9884445BD6 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:10:38 -0600 (CST) by serv-4.i.ord.giganews.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 4B40Ac9c021192; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:10:38 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: serv-4.i.ord.giganews.com: news set sender to poster@giganews.com using -f X-Path: news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:10:37 +0000 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 7401 RonO wrote: > On 12/3/2024 8:40 AM, RonO wrote: >> On 12/2/2024 6:35 PM, RonO wrote: >>> On 12/2/2024 1:40 PM, RonO wrote: >>>> https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/situation-summary/index.html >>>> https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/situation-summary/mammals.html >>>> >>>> I can't find any announcement, but the CDC has increased the >>>> California numbers by 2 today (Dec. 2).  The USDA has increased the >>>> number of herds infected to 689, but I do not know what states are >>>> affected because they haven't updated their data sheet.  It still has >>>> the old Nov 27 confirmed data that they put up last Friday. >>>> >>>> Ron Okimoto >>>> >>> >>> https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-11-29/raw-farm-sales- >>> suspended >>> >>> Another batch of raw milk products came up positive from the same >>> dairy that tested positive.  Initial bulk milk tank testing was >>> negative, but the farm has identify several asymptomatic positive >>> cows.  So the farm was infected and didn't know it. >>> >>> https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/california- >>> reports- h5n1-more-retail-raw-milk-virus-infects-2-more-dairy >>> >>> CIDRAP notes that two more California dairy workers have been >>> confirmed.   California isn't announcing positives until they are >>> confirmed and it takes the CDC quite a while to confirm cases.  They >>> may still be working on the original batch of samples submitted by >>> California around a month ago.  I recall a news article that claimed >>> that 39 samples had been submitted, and the CDC has only released 30 >>> positives and 1 that could not be confirmed.  That would mean that the >>> CDC is still working on 8 samples.  It could be that the article got >>> the numbers wrong, or I misinterpreted number of workers tested and >>> submitted.  California stopped announcing how many workers that they >>> had tested. >>> >>> CIDRAP also claims more poultry flocks have gone down in 3 states, but >>> doesn't name the states or the size of the poultry flocks.  Washington >>> should have identified their positive dairy herds by now, and it is >>> pretty sad that they haven't bothered to test their dairies. >>> >>> Ron Okimoto >>> >> It was actually 6 states that had poultry flocks go down.  All 6 should >> be looking for their infected dairy herds to try to stop the spread. >> Utah was stupid and stopped testing after they found 8 infected herds in >> the same county as the infected poultry farm.  They knew that they >> should have implemented contact tracing or bulk milk tank testing like >> California to find all the other infected herds, but like all the other >> states they went into denial.  Now another poultry farm in another Utah >> county has gone down with the dairy virus.  More poultry workers are >> being exposed to the virus, and it could have been prevented.  The price >> of eggs is going up because of the stupid way in which the USDA and CDC >> have handled this fiasco. >> >> The stupidest thing is that the USDA and CDC are letting the states get >> away with this stupid behavior because they keep calling the dairy >> epidemic "avian influenza" when they know that it has been primarily a >> dairy infection since March. >> >> Dairies are spreading the virus because dairy cattle shed huge amounts >> of virus, and dairy workers get infected and go to other farms >> (including poultry farms) and infect the new farms.  Transport of cattle >> has been limited to tested and negative animals since April, but the >> virus still spreads to states that did not get cattle and poultry farms >> that obviously did not get cattle.  It isn't rocket science, but the CDC >> and USDA have refused to face reality since the beginning when the first >> dairy worker was confirmed to be infected and was shedding live >> culturable virus. >> >> Ron Okimoto >> > USDA had posted 6 more dairies (total 488), but the sample numbers go > to 508, so there are more in the que. > > It has likely been over 2 weeks since the USDA was supposed to start > bulk milk tank testing, and those results should be coming in. 27% of > the California dairies are already known to be positive. The raw milk > issue indicates that bulk milk tank testing can miss positive herds. I > do not know how they are going to get around this, but they claim that > the herds should be tested on a routine basis, hopefully around once a > week, so even if they miss a herd it will likely test positive in a > couple of testings if there are infected cattle on the farm. > Can the cattle flu variants evolve away from the test resulting in false negatives?