Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Tarski Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:21 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <6f2dndBWC7gd4Dr6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <3f1ed83042ed4a260d1a63ef7c61528ea9858947@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b60cb9bc97a9ab52829bfef2b8b9226f"; logging-data="2489793"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vQdXbe2ODRr62AYOhoi9ypchZIeoa5Gw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:oBOmB9hLFVBkBeqaqeEsv8eqDs0= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3620 On 11/02/2025 23:56, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 02/10/2025 09:32 PM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >> On 11/02/2025 03:19, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> >>>>>>> We live in a yellow submarine, just yellower and yellower. >>> >>> The Comenius language that Comenius posits, is also >>> like Leibniz' universal language, which also he posits, >> >> Language is a tool in Leibniz, not the primary thing. >> >> >> Indeed, all you keep spouting is rather anti-Leibniz. >> Not per chance, in this empire of fundamental inversions. >> >>> like Nietzsche's eternal text, which he bemoans its >>> absence, and like Quine in Word & Object, ignores. >>> >>> A footnote in Quine refers to Russell's inconstancy, >>> or mere generously, development, with regards to >>> "never knowing what he is talking about". >>> >>> Nietzsche as well had a later greater return >>> to Platonism, though it was much less promoted >>> since logical positivists of a particular formal >>> variety don't care for it. >>> >>> Then the pre-geometric (technical, mathematical, ideal) >>> and pre-scientific (technical, scientific, analytical) >>> have that Derrida for Husserl very much has it so >>> part of the Lebenswelt, which we inhabit. >>> >>> (analytical) >> >> I once wrote a little word randomizer: given any text in >> input, it spit out prose that was more honest than yours. > > You mentioned "inversions", it's considered primary, > the inversion, more primary than contradiction. Nazi-retarded pieces of shit. Go fuck yourself, you and the whole bandwagon. *Plonk* -Julio