Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.theory
Subject: Re: Universal Compiler
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:16:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vo9rpc$hlnr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <i9veqjte3fgrr1270n4m78i8u77s4oth47@4ax.com> <vo80nd$4bgi$1@dont-email.me> <pt1fqj1mh03trhqppu0tj9pik63nfitjc3@4ax.com> <vo81d9$4frb$1@dont-email.me> <ng2fqjlablg2ts8dpvddgam4rqli19u350@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 10:16:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01b62dcf63122e187ec52c19fe8a3a43";
	logging-data="579323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KsWhtgKyVCzn3QXA+5n4D"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SAU5tC3Hb6Lmn7l2gSZXKd0j6DM=
Bytes: 1812

On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:46:54 +0000
Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> wibbled:
>On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com
>wrote:
>>Take a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can re-invent
>>the wheel so much better than people with decades of experience.
>
>Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised?  You need to learn
>how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.

You have had a habit in the past of making grand pronouncements of your
own abilities and have demonstrated bugger all. Why will this be any different?

>>Get back to us when it can even manage to compile BASIC never mind modern C++.
>
>
>BASIC would be trivial to support.

Go on then, lets see it.

>>Btw, what CPUs are you targeting?
>
>TBD

Oh right, so you're just working on a parser, not an actual compiler. Got it.