Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Date: 9 Jan 2025 00:42:41 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad> <08d05lx8s4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net fZ861PnjBvCy+j4rdqLh1AKqeslR6iGs/OPqF3yJzZvNDdyEiO Cancel-Lock: sha1:zz0xjd5GggIWG/UtsTb69+ClMfg= sha256:B3BZ6/ug9v8YRn/6h4zXuCY71zrhn2yYso1hAvtv6Ak= User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Bytes: 2060 On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to > annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the > minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric > vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military > reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa.