Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Karen Bass Tweets That Did Not Age Well
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:16:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vnji44$3n47t$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vn8raa$16pd6$3@dont-email.me> <vnj29u$3jobu$4@dont-email.me>
 <vnj3c4$3k34n$2@dont-email.me> <vnjaif$3lioc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vnjb8n$3lqd9$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 23:16:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="559df8519c024555ab02b0f4d035fcee";
	logging-data="3903741"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18n64WMa8GneLMLrTDLOCfijr42+84ownw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TMN8IAYNvA0cOTHpbEgUINMFnus=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vnjb8n$3lqd9$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2808

On 1/31/2025 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2025 at 12:07:41 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 1/31/2025 1:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Jan 31, 2025 at 9:46:36 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 1/31/2025 12:22 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>     On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:10:24 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 1/28/2025 10:23 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>>     On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:38:45 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     So what is she being criticized for?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     She's being criticized by Republicans because she's a Democrat.  Her
>>>>>>>>     apparent incompetence just makes for better political theater.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     In fairness Republicans WILL criticize Democrats and there are enough
>>>>>>>     of each that there are BOUND to be a few on far left of the bell curve
>>>>>>>     for competence (between totally incompetent and being a
>>>>>>>     miracle-worker)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     The good ones don't get the flak.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Nowadays, the opposing party will ALWAYS attack the most vulnerable,
>>>>>>     even were there only archangels to choose among.
>>>>>>
>>>>>     An exaggeration but not by much...
>>>>
>>>>   Every archangel has a Lucifer in him.
>>>   
>>>   According to the Christian theology, that's literally not true.
>>
>> Why not? Can there be only one?
> 
> Yes, Lucifer was unique.

Iirc, Lucifer started out as an archangel-in-good-standing ...i.e., like 
all the others are now.