Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:00:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <dd8594509bb413ced8acf4cdbd1f9407c176cf98@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vidcv3$18pdu$1@dont-email.me>
	<bdbc0e3d-1db2-4d6a-9f71-368d36d96b40@tha.de> <vier32$1madr$1@dont-email.me>
	<vierv5$1l1ot$2@dont-email.me> <viiqfd$2qq41$5@dont-email.me>
	<vik73d$3a9jm$1@dont-email.me> <vikg6c$3c4tu$1@dont-email.me>
	<9bcc128b-dea8-4397-9963-45c93d1c14c7@att.net>
	<vimvgd$3vv5r$9@dont-email.me>
	<50c82b03-8aa1-492c-9af3-4cf2673d6516@att.net> <vip5mo$p0da$1@dont-email.me>
	<vipb6l$qfig$1@dont-email.me> <viplj0$t1f8$1@dont-email.me>
	<5a122d22-2b21-4d65-9f5b-4f226eebf9d4@att.net>
	<viq3i2$105iq$1@dont-email.me>
	<e055ec41-a98d-4917-802f-169575a5b556@att.net>
	<virq3t$1gs07$1@dont-email.me>
	<c8faf784-348a-42e9-a784-b2337f4e8160@att.net>
	<3af23566-0dfc-4001-b19b-96e5d4110fee@tha.de>
	<9627c2aea5e3ebabd917ab0b9d1c7b241821d893@i2pn2.org>
	<vit62l$1rfas$1@dont-email.me>
	<b656288bb1d5bed80574cd066a1a7f06258e70bc@i2pn2.org>
	<vj2fv4$3b1no$2@dont-email.me>
	<cfe4e9fb6b3c7da70289d4a7a040f25b64ed8e94@i2pn2.org>
	<vj3tv7$3nktg$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:00:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2789670"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2498
Lines: 14

Am Sun, 08 Dec 2024 11:55:34 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 08.12.2024 11:43, joes wrote:
>> Am Sat, 07 Dec 2024 22:50:27 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> ∀n ∈ ℕ: E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n)
>>> All n are infinitely many.
>> That sentence only talks about a single n at a time, though,
>> not about the infinite intersection.
> It talks about all n and therefore about all E(n).
No, it says nothing about the intersection of all E(n),
only about finite intersections

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.