Path: ...!news.nobody.at!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=C3=B6ker?= Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded Subject: Re: Static regex for embedded systems Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 20:40:23 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.dfncis.de Yck6zn4wmFUkLQFDZeTD1wpDPvReawRzWLWaMD0r1FVjTqGGOAMcxvfpl/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:o9TTHzb0IkP7Whuv4RB+Ba3hymM= sha256:cWz4OpcEcSlJuO+dTj3saYou3HmOri2BIGrDMp96eVc= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1085 Am 21.01.2025 um 18:03 schrieb pozz: > The hiddend question was if there's a better approach than handcrafted > parsers. Yes --- for some definition of "better". No --- for some others.