Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Poulsen Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Time machine backups Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 14:37:31 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <4RVeP.812124$bYV2.164030@fx17.iad> Injection-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:37:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30b5098d674d22502ffae76cc026d594"; logging-data="2966300"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5ijTATnWQ2sQfosVOGMXSF/R754uhrE0=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BCcbDIxTIHC/YTIccgBkmxFHeAw= Bytes: 2621 On 2025-01-08, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Anyioe expecting to preserve an ext4 file system accurately on a samba > mounted share needs their head examined. > Use NFS. I am not expecting to accurately have an exact ext4 system on a share. Just keeps the data, but deduplicated. AFAIK, Hetzner does not allow NFS access to their very cost-effective storage boxes. And while it is very simple to run a Fedora instance on the datacenter, the virtual machines there have limited storage, and you provision storage by samba-mounting a storage box. It is a great system, but has its limitations. I wish I could figure out how to provision the same features in AWS, but I find the learning curve to steep for my old brain.