Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Riley Gaines advocates for women! Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:33:32 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 75 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:33:34 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e1671ab781e3cad73710cd5f0af0f0e5"; logging-data="3210710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SrXxhZmWS7FaXOkP65p4IVsEidxMHD6c=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:e7GJTW8LPGcthhomOXbdZLnP3Fg= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4447 On 1/30/2025 7:08 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:45:45 -0500, moviePig > wrote: > >> On 1/28/2025 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 19:33:47 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 27, 2025 at 8:18:59 AM PST, "moviePig" wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/27/2025 12:03 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> On Jan 26, 2025 at 7:56:12 PM PST, "moviePig" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 9:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:53:51 PM PST, "moviePig" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Jan 26, 2025 at 3:01:51 PM PST, "moviePig" >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 25, 2025 at 9:57:03 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Riley Gaines slams Democrats. Republicans take the moral high ground. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kItskvsbizI >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Love Riley. She speaks facts. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What law forces a declaration of gender at birth? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what video you watched, but this one was about a law >>>>>>>>>> stopping >>>>>>>>>> grown men from sexually assaulting female athletes by exposing >>>>>>>>>> themselves in >>>>>>>>>> women's private restrooms and changing rooms, and keeping men from >>>>>>>>>> taking >>>>>>>>>> trophies, scholarships, and other benefits in sports by pretending to be >>>>>>>>>> women. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is not a law about forcing declarations of gender at birth. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe I misunderstood. I thought the issue came down to who's male and >>>>>>>>> who's female, with the debatable certainty of one or the other. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you're a female athlete and there's a penis wagging in your face in the >>>>>>>> women's locker room, it's pretty certain what the problem is there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not sure it *is* all that certain. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course you're not. What's brutally obvious to normal people continually >>>>>> eludes you. >>>>>> >>>>>>> E.g., *any* uninvited crotch in >>>>>>> *anyone's* face is problematic. Regardless, I think the particular >>>>>>> social mores you want enforced would need you to define, in unambiguous >>>>>>> legalese, who's male and who's female. Imo, that won't be trivial. >>>>> >>>>> Rather than resort to ad hominem, why not state the "brutally obvious"? >>>> >>>> The man had his penis exposed in a women's locker room. >>>> >>> >>> Goodness how WILL we tell the difference? >>> Laughter. >> >> The difference between what? >> > > The difference between women and men pretending to be women. Didn't know that was a puzzle, but okay...