Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.strips,rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: xkcd: Human Altitude Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:58:20 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:21 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25e4c13f0f63762d3d74a5e3d78e604e"; logging-data="1773486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193Itofs/8vk0vWQqIdyJbPBGtrdhjIkes=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:2k2jnE7hVl00XTjQgSfXV4ZnkCs= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2371 On 1/23/2025 12:57 AM, Robert Woodward wrote: > In article , > Your Name wrote: > >> On 2025-01-22 20:53:09 +0000, Lynn McGuire said: >>> On 1/21/2025 8:40 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: >>>> Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Note that the chart does not require reaching Mars, just reaching new >>>>> altitudes. >>>> >>>> Yes: you could send a basketball player to the moon for instance. >>>> --scott >>> >>> That height difference would be lost in the plot. >>> >>> Lynn >> >> It would also only work if the basketball played stood on the far side >> of the Moon, which nobody has done yet. > > It would have to be at the Moon's apogee, because the eccentricity of > the Moon's orbit far surpasses its diameter. > That's an interesting point. The 'highest' altitude wouldn't be someone standing on the Moon's far side. It would be one the Apollo capsule commanders, who remained in the ship while the other two landed. Which was the furthest from Earth would require checking the orbital distance on the dates they were in orbit. pt