Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: USA Election Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 22:26:32 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:26:31 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="917b40bbb015a8d7834683bfe3d7eb9c"; logging-data="1657410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QN91ixJ8R8f/k2uHrCcDAfW/UO+kuoB8=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:bqkZZxhaETojbMI7LkZ0LiV+Muw= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2478 The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am: > On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote: >> The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am: >>> On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote: >> >> >> >>>> Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW against >>>> a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and after Jodie >>>> Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can seriously claim >>>> you gave her a chance. The evidence proves otherwise. >>> >>> Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode just >>> like over 10 million other people including myself. Giving someone a >>> chance don't mean you have to support and believe in them from the >>> very start. In fact it means the exact opposite, not supporting or >>> believing in them but letting them try to persuade you otherwise. >> >> When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you thinking >> "This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were >> you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what >> happens??" > > The latter. >> >> Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'?? > So no responce to my second situation/question?? -- Daniel