Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jean-Pierre Kuypers <Kuypers@address.invalid>
Newsgroups: fr.comp.sys.mac.communication
Subject: Re: Conseil Organisation IMAP
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 11:32:48 +0100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <180120251132480035%Kuypers@address.invalid>
References: <vlttbn$3nu$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <vm6ji5$2j3ep$1@dont-email.me> <vm84au$2trvt$1@dont-email.me> <vm878m$2ud01$1@dont-email.me> <vm87kp$2ufai$1@dont-email.me> <vm89n3$2uq1k$1@dont-email.me> <vm8m18$30peh$1@dont-email.me> <vm8n5k$vga$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <vmaneu$3fc7t$1@dont-email.me> <vmaon1$3ffnk$2@dont-email.me> <vmaq7p$3fs9n$1@dont-email.me> <vmb04r$3goa6$3@dont-email.me> <vmb0e8$3gv5s$1@dont-email.me> <vmb5hp$3goa5$1@dont-email.me> <vmb6mg$3i095$1@dont-email.me> <vmb902$3goa6$5@dont-email.me> <vmbdkm$319$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <vmbhsl$3jsur$2@dont-email.me> <vmdgjg$vq2$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <170120251457298581%Kuypers@address.invalid> <vmdo4i$efi$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <170120251519287680%Kuypers@address.invalid> <vme3ak$5cb$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <vme490$52re$1@dont-email.me> <vme7hj$49oo$2@dont-email.me> <170120252151349900%Kuypers@address.invalid> <vmekbf$49on$3@dont-email.me> <180120251014177396%Kuypers@address.invalid> <vmfuvs$ni13$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net RAki+KZsiihWLMhfqnb2nQ956RlFqqMxVcVJ+vyYAyQizTx7pS
X-Orig-Path: Kuypers
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u/Y3rTNNIF5cNnTa1MK5Nm0qgrU= sha256:y+D9Kd89ExxRF2R2YgIwBmmgyAZSCNQEbiqDxDQpnKA=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.1F (Mac OS X)
X-Face: GI\+Qjzy|+pI?Iv#Z`q8>9B.lMEdYivZtgHz]H]a,L<<=~W^2~~#9#'jQ>p$nD|%Q4vQ<7-|hS`p%
Bytes: 2576

In article (Dans l'article) <vmfuvs$ni13$1@dont-email.me>, jdanield
<jdd@dodin.org> wrote (écrivait) :

> Le 18/01/2025 à 10:14, Jean-Pierre Kuypers a écrit :
> > Par ailleurs, je ne suis pas certain que des protocoles sécurisés tels
> > que IMAPS (port 993) et POP3S (port 995) emploient le Secure Shell
> > (SSH).
> > 
> "SSH, or Secure Shell, is similar to SSL in that they're both PKI based 
> and both form encrypted communication tunnels. But whereas SSL is 
> designed for the transmission of information, SSH is designed to execute 
> commands. You generally see SSH when you want to log in to some part of 
> a network remotely."

Merci pour l'explication.

C'est vrai qu'en employant SSH pour SSL, on va aider à éviter la
confusion...

-- 
Jean-Pierre Kuypers