Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 04:29:48 +0000 Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <655acbf6-05e5-69ff-8a44-9f7075aafa2e@example.net> <20250210093054.00001375@gmail.com> From: "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" Organization: WokieSux Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:29:43 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Lines: 32 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-lQETTCMNd64pp6mW5SKdJmjxgk1GK377WBbNlY/9ic3ZPDxWL25LRZwTZ6KjhdnginoHdHFSsJ27CPa!QWDFvaNGfcRexqsiJs837qBDK4ij3HKwsyHQdhZHDkoHsu24tDSs99VwupwJFw7hAmCyzMjniXPP!0OCYsvss63w1w7vp6EdP X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3391 On 2/11/25 7:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > John Ames wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > >> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:54:27 -0500 >> "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" wrote: >> >>> As for "bondage" ... not sure where you heard that. Pascal - esp the >>> later Borland-derived versions - are a great all-purpose environment >>> and you can actually READ yer code a year later. >> >> Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13 >> years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering mis- >> features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving" bounds- >> checking issues by making array size part of the type specification is >> something only a truly demented brain could ever conceive of.) > > Can you say "std::array<>"? > > I knew you could. :-) Nothing wrong, or unique, about fixed-size arrays. You don't want them for some stuff, do want them for other stuff. CAN elim a lot of range-checking code. >> Of course, there were other extended versions of the language predating >> TP - but, as Brian Kernighan famously observed, they mostly just made >> it look more like whatever language the implementors *really* wanted. >