Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 05:29:55 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <1WoqP.4088$NgFa.1524@fx46.iad> <6CIqP.4095$NgFa.688@fx46.iad> <67b07a28$0$29716$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <0bi2rjtfpg16d2fmbfbjkn4hn2nmqoobji@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:29:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9855949604aedcf51b441e9be698a62b"; logging-data="1080827"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BZjZP4IDccRl9NlUWz1l1" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:87O32/V1MeV3jVBqeNBYNQcdMgY= Bytes: 1774 On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 08:40:02 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > The people behind it can't even be bothered to fix the interface and > take it out of mid-1990s. Form wins over function, eh? Never mind what the software *does*, what matters is how it *looks*.