Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: JAB Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss Subject: Re: Gulf Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:26:29 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: JAB MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 04:26:32 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a8bb987ac4e78f786feb1eeab5728de1"; logging-data="2770231"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CmAA7eUHSVj4ec+Hpzf+H" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:1Du7NIIcjlEi8AHrekeft/r3mHg= Bytes: 1379 On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:12:49 -0600, JAB wrote: >PIC > Encyclopaeia Britannica will continue to use 'Gulf of Mexico' for a few reasons: We serve an international audience, a majority of which is outside the U.S. The Gulf of Mexico is an international body of water, and the U.S.'s authority to rename it is ambiguous. https://x.com/Britannica/status/1889723591949795671