Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:49:20 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <0b1bb1a1-40e3-464f-9e3d-a5ac22dfdc6f@tha.de> <95183b4d9c2e32651963bac79965313ad2bfe7e8@i2pn2.org> <33512b63716ac263c16b7d64cd1d77578c8aea9d@i2pn2.org> <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org> <7aa4daa380966c031798568433c3a7e079cd29cf@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:49:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="22f1e3b0c4513fe0a907c4a82bf16a00"; logging-data="1286071"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sQno1Hh6FehAf2cTBWmjfHbwjYvXSsqQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:DtJl+dwnecSc1LjHibNfeSo/DOY= In-Reply-To: <7aa4daa380966c031798568433c3a7e079cd29cf@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2584 On 16.12.2024 16:40, joes wrote: > Am Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:59:27 +0100 schrieb WM: >> On 16.12.2024 12:55, joes wrote: >>> Am Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:30:18 +0100 schrieb WM: >> >>>> All intervals do it because there is no n outside of all intervals [1, >>>> n]. My proof applies all intervals. >>> It does not. It applies to every single finite „interval”, >> What element is not covered by all intervals that I use? >>> but not to the whole N. > You do not cover N, only finite parts. What do I miss to cover? Regards, WM