Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:28:51 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vi7ve3$5fnv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vhtb3o$1r2tr$1@dont-email.me>
 <0d6d06a888e15ed2042aca8ec7e6ebb93590b7bc@i2pn2.org>
 <vhtgec$1rdku$3@dont-email.me>
 <8a2aedd8383a84ceef2fd985ac0bf529e2a0eccf@i2pn2.org>
 <vhuv94$25ro0$1@dont-email.me>
 <be7b74a5d83b8ceebd1ec380bb57ff4190ec0cae@i2pn2.org>
 <vhv61v$25uqa$5@dont-email.me>
 <b75deca6b1a0631255cf1402ee83db2b266edd22@i2pn2.org>
 <vhvnvc$2aq7k$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe6ef31f562e0ddf598de46cf864986ca909687@i2pn2.org>
 <vi1pul$2n5v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <9cb8aec671200bb6d71582fd607b876b7ec4c83a@i2pn2.org>
 <vi43br$3cllo$3@dont-email.me> <vi4ak0$3e1nc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4b5d$3dq30$1@dont-email.me>
 <40292abc147fee5a7bdd264b69d34ddf2061e59d@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4upt$3hg8t$1@dont-email.me>
 <c43fe07653eac2a9cc0432a6e289bfa1307613f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vi6rau$3v0dn$1@dont-email.me>
 <0bc3cdc8c096bba16decd94ad2af85d35da9b7b4@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7jv2$377e$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd3b1465f1afb40960f5969b583b179a26291d6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7r4m$g2n7$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:28:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce9ecf2e7ec11584eaae6495547bc79a";
	logging-data="179967"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5HwSEHJijBHTLd9JTUio/wrdgxcmvE/U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QVRLzPt1av9nIvmDSWz18pVg5Xg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vi7r4m$g2n7$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 2700

On 11/27/2024 11:15 AM, WM wrote:
> On 27.11.2024 18:58, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/27/24 12:13 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Replacing every element of the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} by its successor 
>>> yields {1, 2, 3, ..., ω}. The number of ordinals remains the same, 
>>> the number of finite ordinals decreases.
>>
>> Nope, because omega is NOT the successor for any natural number, the 
>> successor of EVERY Natural Number is a Natural Number.
> 
> The successor of the last natural number is ω.

There is no last natural number you fucking dipshit!



> 
>> It it the successor for the SET of natural numbers.
> 
> And that is nothing else but all natural numbers.
> 
> Regards, WM