Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 04:24:16 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <2bcfafdbaa01b3788c2ec4ff65e3890c@www.novabbs.com>
References: <9f779645de1a83b1f2f35ab0a1885329@www.novabbs.com> <1826007a482dd75b$2449$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <bde0ac6f7aa9059e84658916b8af2ab9@www.novabbs.com> <saNtP.10507$jgOa.5162@fx17.ams4> <kouLCsgAPww84eUhy98fxyEW4i0@jntp> <m1qrkcFu6qdU5@mid.individual.net> <R2F832BcXoyJihIgfMeF6ml2obE@jntp> <m1tcq0Fbu8uU1@mid.individual.net> <zJoYTxE6KhyhZU0L982EhziUQRg@jntp> <b4c53cebedcab4247d2df9cbdc27de46@www.novabbs.com> <e62ykqQxz_hsywNZNFvPLuQuJdM@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1349776"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$d6KMQB0HL3e8ZJlTTTcxze3xrXbDrhUr5iddrcW797SalYEHiwT9G
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 2767
Lines: 32

On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 23:22:44 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 22/02/2025 à 22:43, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
> :
>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:52:31 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
>> Relativity is prestigious because it is not critically examined. If it
>> were, it would be seen to be nonsense, as thousands of scientists have
>> pointed out.
>
> The problem is that all those who have tried to contradict or improve
> the
> theory of relativity have done worse than better.
> Absolutely all of them.
> Since 1905, and the publication of Poincaré's work, everything that has
> been added to it has made the theory drift into horror.
> The theory of Minkowskian space, the explanation of the Langevin paradox
> by the Doppler effect (but omitting the fantastic theoretical spatial
> zoom
> by change of reference frame that no one takes into account), black
> holes,
> spaghetti deformations, white fountains and wormholes, all this has
> turned
> into the absurd.
> Even today, those who seek are looking badly.
> And those who are wrong not to seek are just as much lost in useless
> skepticism.
>
> R.H.
Hercule Poirot would understand that some things are 99% untrustworthy.
I find that most critics of relativity, especially you, don't go far
enough. For example, the photoelectric effect does not prove or call for
photons.