Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 16:59:22 -0500 Organization: Peripheral Visions Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <903de8e1-3538-4cfe-9f7a-6509eda47ab6@att.net> <3844edd7-0750-4418-bff6-2759817446b3@att.net> <27377646-137a-4f8f-a7bb-a75707b2da96@att.net> <4d349964-211f-42f1-936f-81c22ae54cb5@att.net> <6e0c8ab2-402a-43a5-a348-0c727eae6a2e@att.net> Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 22:59:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a30c4a67430c3d1f1581f675d53d4553"; logging-data="3307857"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KV/KSkbgCJKIDBJJxXoQ6vlN5YkzbmJ0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:fi2Fz0knJUGAqwn2vgK5d06vVCE= X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb X-ICQ: 1701145376 Bytes: 3374 WM explained on 1/30/2025 : > On 30.01.2025 20:54, FromTheRafters wrote: >> WM explained on 1/30/2025 : >>> On 30.01.2025 11:41, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>> WM formulated the question : >>>>> On 29.01.2025 15:04, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>>>> WM explained on 1/29/2025 : >>>>>>> On 29.01.2025 10:38, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Omega has no immediate predecessor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is immediately before ω? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing, it is the initial member of the transfinite ordinals. just as >>>>>> zero is the initial member of the finite ordinals. >>>>> >>>>> There is something before zero. >>>> >>>> Not in the ordinals, which is what you say the context is this time. >>> >>> Not in the known ordinals. But if anything else, then name it, and how >>> many of these are there. >>>> >>>>>>> And how long is the distance from ω to a natnumber? >>>>>> >>>>>> This makes no sense. >>>>> >>>>> It is research. >>>> >>>> Is there a 'distance' metric in the ordinals? >>>> >>>> ============================================ >>>> AI Overview >>>> >>>> No, there is no inherent "distance" metric in ordinal numbers >>> >>> Wrong. The ordinals 7 and 27 have the distance 27 - 7 = 20. >> >> Finite ordinals are like finite cardinalities. > > Fine. Why do you mention this triviality? Because you treat ordinals as if they were cardinals.