Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:42:41 -0800 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 28 Message-ID: <87sentkoni.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87frk10w51.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <20250228144442.00002037@yahoo.com> <868qpnw2sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8734ftn1fb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 12:42:46 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec036b031ec9540f8be3589d056f824a"; logging-data="1958152"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HdJq84PfKpEx1EStkkvPD" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qhk0guyLLsiseILPXFv0+wyj8wE= sha1:6sngMqxDeNJN1sjGTAn7hJhaAoA= Bytes: 2492 Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 06:12:54 +0100, Janis Papanagnou wrote: >> On 04.03.2025 04:17, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> Where did 132-column printers come from? >> >> From IBM ? - Or S&H ? > > The point being, the idea that 80 columns is a good line length for > programming is, shall we say, based on doubtful evidence. Why are you writing that in (indirect) response to a post in which I already acknowledged that? If your question about 132-column printers was intended to make a point, why not just make that point directly? From upthread, where I summarized the technological background for 80-column lines: """ I'll just note that the fact that 80 is an arbitrary number, based on technologies we no longer use, doesn't automatically mean that it's a bad rule of thumb for line length. """ -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */