Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most?
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 21:30:27 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <86a5a4xamk.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87v7swzzl7.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <87a5a7k0ko.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <8734fzozd2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250228141947.000056b8@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 06:30:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3262fa73ab11de5fd8cc37f0606a7eed";
logging-data="695078"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ntcuQpD0SQiEq82CKvheoA7Sj0yasOzE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kwfny2t1EoZdSqnOOP+Z+oPpNYw=
sha1:qc9U9kRttKNmDg3RwtP7DIv2M9w=
Bytes: 1820
Michael S writes:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:24:19 +0000
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
>> On 28/02/2025 09:22, David Brown wrote:
>>
>>> As long as it's not "Long time no C" :-)
>>
>> I'm afraid it is. Nowadays I spend most of my time arguing with
>> \LaTeX, although when I do cut code it is in C (and that's proper
>> C, of course, not this newfangled gibberish).
>
> one man's newfangled gibberish is another man's proper C
+1