Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-01-19 (Sunday) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 03:54:38 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <2116058341.759116140.201111.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:54:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b5536192d20e80ea3e6c04e4ebd4c78a"; logging-data="3971712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19loeC//gXfck8wi/buq0tfmHADL8apTAU=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:I8ophiFqnueO7KRp1oYaWP+8Zyo= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2299 suzeeq wrote: >On 1/20/2025 5:39 PM, anim8rfsk wrote: >>Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>Ian J. Ball wrote: >>>>On 1/20/25 1:18 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >>>>>'Moonraker'. And yes, the physics ARE complete male bovine digestive >>>>>end product but its still a fun flick. :) >>>>I have it on good authority that "Moonraker" is the best Bond film, >>>>EVAH!! ;p >>>I despise this movie on principle that they made such a horrid >>>adaptation of Fleming's best novel. All they had to do was set the movie >>>story in the 1950s, same as the novel, and it would have been a great >>>movie. We don't need Bond In Space in, essentially, a remake of major >>>elements of You Only Live Twice and The Spy Who Loved Me. >>>Why not set the movie in the 1950s? There's absolutely no continuity. >>So what about the book requires it to be set in the 50s? >It was written then and there was no space program. Drax was a Nazi posing as a patriot who wanted to give the gift of a nuclear weapon and missile to the UK in defence but in reality wanted revenge REVENGE and destroy London. The bridge game in which Bond first faced off with Drax was some of Fleming's best writing. A little bit of the game is in the movie but it wasn't as exciting.