Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Local Versus Global Command Options Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 22:18:27 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <67afe79c$0$719$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <67b54873$0$709$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <67b647c3$0$712$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 23:18:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aea17308c83eb3b6ce7ccaa2f98ba275"; logging-data="3775906"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ed3+qDe19Jbd7S5yOOlR/" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lxN3ZNYTPdWXhSNSqoiVKDQffbQ= Bytes: 1883 On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:42:56 -0500, Stephen Hoffman wrote: > Is it feasible for DCL? Sure. Though it'll likely involve passing some > of the syntax to lib$table_parse or ilk for parsing, as do a few DCL > commands I've encountered (or have written) over the years. What happens when you bypass DCL? So one program directly spawns another and gives it a command to execute. Can the receiving program behave the same in that case as if it were invoked from a shell?