Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Local Versus Global Command Options
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 23:15:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vpbj1e$3mg8f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vonh1j$3fukn$1@dont-email.me> <vonr8r$3ghb6$1@dont-email.me>
 <voo40m$3jej5$1@dont-email.me> <vookpo$3mk0q$1@dont-email.me>
 <67afe79c$0$719$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <voqpjj$5mpo$1@dont-email.me>
 <votq85$ptnb$1@dont-email.me> <vp015a$19ajm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp0qua$1dbh3$1@dont-email.me> <67b54873$0$709$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <vp3hlk$n28$1@reader2.panix.com> <vp3mel$1m224$1@dont-email.me>
 <67b647c3$0$712$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <vp5jsd$j2u$1@reader2.panix.com>
 <vpas10$3irvn$1@dont-email.me> <vpau3j$3j7d2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpb6mh$3krmq$1@dont-email.me> <vpbf5a$3m0hp$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 05:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a8b2652d2544001fa06865b957e7aadc";
	logging-data="3883279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mbj30/B3OqlN+cC5RxlehyOGObokCo5I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bpxUPRK1M2C0l1BurHb4OTVG0FU=
In-Reply-To: <vpbf5a$3m0hp$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2905

On 2/21/2025 10:09 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:45:05 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> It is possible to start a process without CLI (sys$creprc or run process
>> - with an image that is not loginout.exe).
>>
>> In that case I don't think there are a concept of arguments.
>> I don't see a way to pass arguments. Arguments are something CLI provide
>> to image, so no CLI means no arguments.
> 
> Mr Berryman, further up this thread, was so insistent that I was talking
> through my hat. Remember he said:
> 
> ] Wrong again. There are a number of ways to invoke a program without
> ] going through DCL.
> 
> and furthermore
> 
> ] You apparently know as little about VMS as you do programming in
> ] general.
> 
> as well as
> 
> ] Everyone else: Yes, I've once again been forced to face the fact
> ] that you can't fix stupid.
> 
> He couldn’t have made a mistake, could he?

I don't see any indication of that.

There are some ways to start a process with a DCL command
(and therefore DCL mapped).

There are some ways to start a process without specifying a DCL
command and still getting a process with DCL mapped.

There are some ways to start a process without DCL mapped.

Arne