Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail From: Grant Taylor Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: Filtering HELO / EHLO names before MAIL FROM Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:03:27 -0600 Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:03:27 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.11"; logging-data="14510"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: On 1/4/25 14:03, Claus Aßmann wrote: > Yes, esp. 421. > Maybe that's the best for your problem? I'll have to evaluate the temp fail. > But any command other than QUIT (and a few others which do not start > a transaction) will be rejected, correct? The command(s) that I tested do end up getting a 5xy error after causing the reject. I would have hoped there was a 5xy series error that could be returned when sending the SMFIS_REJECT (?from memory?) in response to the helo callback. I need to reference some RFCs to see if such is even allowed. -- Grant. . . .