Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong [2] Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:19:58 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <119e547c3e83ba976982163b6dcae24281ac168e@i2pn2.org> References: <032b4871d813d3a0ff4dc7dcbf50cb6f2f26550b@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:19:58 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2480367"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 4681 Lines: 56 Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:04:51 -0600 schrieb olcott: > On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote: >> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation >>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation >>>>>>>>> sequence long ago. >>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH? >>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th >>>>>>>> instruction, >>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction, >>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH. >>>>>> There can be no correct continuation. >>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist. >>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is. >>> That dishonestly dodged the original question: >>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH? >> Look at what HHH1 does. >> >>> _DD() >>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002134] 8bec >>> mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002136] 51 push ecx ; >>> make space for local [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002144] 8945fc mov >>> [ebp-04],eax [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [0000214b] >>> 7402 jz 0000214f [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d [0000214f] >>> 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002155] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] > >> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH > It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and HHH does not > ignore this call. You didn't ask for the trace of HHH. > What are the hexadecimal machine addresses of the first 10 lines of DD > correctly emulated by HHH? > A failure to answer that question with ten hexadecimal values proves > that the reviewer is either dishonest or clueless. Or lazy. See below. >> because it doesn't call DD in turn, >> we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we either >> enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions) >> or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the >> return value of HHH. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.