Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- philosophy of logic Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:03:20 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <0f7cd503773838ad12f124f23106d53552e277b8@i2pn2.org> <7e3e9d35d880cfcad12f505dfb39c5650cdd249e@i2pn2.org> <3cf165ef9793e844dc9d5db82aecbc47f9545367@i2pn2.org> <080bf2b1c322247548c6ec61c9f054359062ccd4@i2pn2.org> <6fc61a762b56308f9919993f29ba3e77f7ba84c7@i2pn2.org> <41ca355a1f535e767e17d3f4df3d404eb1e61cef@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 16:03:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97f905fec9072c5c6bc4c69a1afd3e8e"; logging-data="291254"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ge1tKc7Gu+O7dD01oQABr" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:yeqRwrTOyvYAdZZVTkEnySeeqc0= In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250301-4, 3/1/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 3815 On 3/1/2025 6:49 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 2/28/25 7:20 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 2/28/2025 5:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 2/28/25 5:04 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>> The bottom line here is that expressions that do not have >>>> a truth-maker are always untrue. Logic screws this up by >>>> overriding the common meaning of terms with incompatible >>>> meanings. Provable(common) means has a truth-maker. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> But the problem is you try to make statements that have been shown to >>> have a truth-make untrue, because you don't understand the conneciton >>> to the truth-maker. >>> >> >> Your complete ignorance of the philosophy of logic has >> never been my ignorance of logic. Logic says carefully >> memorize the rules and do not violate these rules. >> >> Philosophy of logic says: What happens when we totally >> change these rules in many different ways? >> >> Do we get a different result when we totally change all >> of these rules? >> >> What if unprovable meant untrue? >> Would that get rid of undecidability? >> >> >> > > And thus you admit that NONE of your statement applies to the fields > they apply to, Philosophy of logic corrects the issues with logic. When we retain the original meanings of the terms then provable(common) is the truth-maker for true(common). It is only the weird idiomatic divergence from these common meanings of common terms using terms-of-the-art meanings that enables incompleteness(math) and undecidability(logic) to exist. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer