Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 07:17:09 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <4c89380adaad983f24d5d6a75842aaabbd1adced@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vkr8j0$t59a$1@dont-email.me>
 <98519289-0542-40ce-886e-b50b401ef8cf@att.net> <vksicn$16oaq$7@dont-email.me>
 <8e95dfce-05e7-4d31-b8f0-43bede36dc9b@att.net> <vl1ckt$2b4hr$1@dont-email.me>
 <53d93728-3442-4198-be92-5c9abe8a0a72@att.net> <vl5tds$39tut$1@dont-email.me>
 <9c18a839-9ab4-4778-84f2-481c77444254@att.net> <vl87n4$3qnct$1@dont-email.me>
 <8ef20494f573dc131234363177017bf9d6b647ee@i2pn2.org>
 <vl95ks$3vk27$2@dont-email.me> <vl9ldf$3796$1@dont-email.me>
 <vlaskd$cr0l$2@dont-email.me> <vlc68u$k8so$1@dont-email.me>
 <vldpj7$vlah$7@dont-email.me>
 <a8b010b748782966268688a38b58fe1a9b4cc087@i2pn2.org>
 <vlei6e$14nve$1@dont-email.me> <66868399-5c4b-4816-9a0c-369aaa824553@att.net>
 <vlir7p$24c51$1@dont-email.me> <417ff6da-86ee-4b3a-b07a-9c6a8eb31368@att.net>
 <vllfof$2n0uj$2@dont-email.me> <07258ab9-eee1-4aae-902a-ba39247d5942@att.net>
 <vlmst2$2vjr0$3@dont-email.me>
 <1ebbc233d6bab7878b69cae3eda48c7bbfd07f88@i2pn2.org>
 <vlo5f4$39hil$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:17:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2766867"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vlo5f4$39hil$2@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2732
Lines: 19

On 1/9/25 4:38 AM, WM wrote:
> On 09.01.2025 00:45, joes wrote:
>> Am Wed, 08 Jan 2025 23:06:27 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1, 2,
>>> 3, ...}. Proof: {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {0}. Cardinality
>>> cannot describe this difference because it covers only mappings of
>>> elements which have almost all elements as successors.
>> You can't talk about size without using |abs|.
> 
> I can and I do. And everybody understands it in case of subsets. This 
> proves, in this special case (and more is not required), that Cantor's 
> size is only a qualitative measure, not a quantitative one.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

No, you show yourzelf to just be a liar.

Sorryk it *IS* true, but you are just too stupid to understand it.