Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Bye Bye, Monolith Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:10:04 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: <71gjsjhj11emqsibepg35f0pm08hnis6ec@4ax.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 06:10:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c9683b86234db45cafbe073cf986a87"; logging-data="1267183"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gjTvzKH/iqg4ZgL1jG/wPtz7t9ksuMU90fIkx48z3aA==" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f2fhoIvRTJ50D+us2iIM2N/8M8I= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA] wrote at 17:14 this Saturday (GMT): > On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:10:07 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 > wrote: > >>Ant wrote at 02:58 this Saturday (GMT): >>> Mike S. wrote: >>>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:36:06 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote: >>> >>>> >Heh, I used to love to replay, rewatch, etc. when I was younger. >>> >>>> Exact opposite for me. When I was younger, I needed to constantly play >>>> a new game. I never stuck with one game for long. It partly explains >>>> why I own so many games. >>> >>>> But these days, I prefer sticking to one game for a long time. To >>>> prove my point, I am still playing Project Highrise, the FIRST game I >>>> got from Spalls from his giveaway. >>> >>> Yeah, I try to avoid playing new full games. >> >> >>I usually don't play modern games, because 1. my computer doesnt support >>it and 2. the microtransaction hell. Indie has gotten quite good. > > While the microtransaction shit is awful, in many games it _is_ > completely avoidable if you don't care about cosmetics and other such > nonsense. > > A lot of games I really enjoy I realize after the fact have all this > nonsense DLC attached to them. But I just shrug, and say, 'Nah, I'm > good with the base game' and move on to the next experience. > > There are too many games, sure, which fuck up their own gameplay and > make it so grindingly awful that MTX solutions become the only way to > enjoy the game, but most MTX in most games I play are about new hats > or a different skin on a gun... and I couldn't give a damn about those > things. > > That's not to say I defend the practice; the publishers are literally > charging us for stuff that used to be in the games by default, and > their loot-box tactics are unabashed gambling mechanics made to keep > you buying more and more in hopes of getting that shiney new hat that > you really want... but if you can just control your desire for shiney > hates, then a lot of that nonsense becomes inconsquential > > (admittedly, a lot of people have problems with that step, which is > why MTX is so corrosively evil) > > > TL;DR: don't avoid modern games just because of MTX. There are still > good experiences out there if you ignore the unfettered greed of the > publishers preying on your FOMO. Right, MTX is one reason, but it's somewhat hard to play any modern games on an older linux laptop :P but if i do get the chance i may try some? -- user is generated from /dev/urandom