Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:18:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <20250306131440.795@kylheku.com> References: <20250304101022.154@kylheku.com> <20250305152224.ea400cb92445c78f6a4ba523@g{oogle}mail.com> <20250305183051.3cca469a0fd757595152b261@g{oogle}mail.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 22:18:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04955cbd15ca2b8c7171511d202c7356"; logging-data="3296427"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4AxDZS1hOX47SyAMrRN4uaZm1x3T2J7E=" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sRB3cKCgs2wcgJ/KSErQPdjW0Hg= Bytes: 2514 On 2025-03-06, Scott Lurndal wrote: > bart writes: >>On 05/03/2025 22:02, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:40:51 +0000, bart wrote: >>> >>>> People are forgetting that in the days of 80-character hardware, >>>> identifiers were often limited to 6 characters or even fewer. >>> >>> COBOL allowed for 30 from the beginning, as I recall. And PL/I allowed 31. >> >>So: >> >>ADD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA TO BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB >>GIVING CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. >> >>? A tight fit for an 80-column card I think. > > A statement could easily span multiple cards. Do a google search > on 'COBOL continuation line'. The "COBOL continuation line" is the result of the ritual when the aging king of COBOL in a given geographic region nominates his younger successor, passing to him the deck of royal punched cards, and a sceptre-like stick for reaching the computer room power switch that is mounted ten feet up on the wall. -- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca