Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: yeti Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Subject: Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:10:41 +0042 Organization: Democratic Order of Pirates International (DOPI) Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87a5cn1pqu.fsf@tilde.institute> References: <20241222.010328.19480a3e@mixmin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 20:28:41 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce3ad3993fbd7df3c81f837751aba60b"; logging-data="807264"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7yCFBCxfx08oKOfCbpuHY" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oQc2Q7hPF7n00Lhi0F0jauLK7g4= sha1:Q1+QC6XwDTeHTH6h59ucdcxoSkw= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAAiklEQVQY02NgoCUQOASmOJwPAElGjuQfIIrH8A9IsK3wJ0jFMcPHDUAVxywPNzCw8Dy3bD7AwMzy+Q/7AQbGvuq57QsYGI+brz+fwMDw+9re/x8YGLPcFP8/YGBccaTg4QcG5o4WBeYGBnaBngTDBJBFDvUHQBY5/G8AWXHgH9j65h9gitmBgfYAAJOqKugnjqEOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Face: "-Nh[_Q`f/iywEEk*gL\V>5N1AB*"sDJ8;EUV=C-0Y@WB9ePs{Cw>dh=u?}LO}?T(5_L2HX `mj:w>@KY3N6`v6Y!/<)"&OTwwj<}i=2g^/|Mp#95.z4HsbUizxbZ*4X085{X||BvThEN9wD=Q1o7" 5d3u_b|SUTt Bytes: 2261 Laika wrote: > It is urgent to reactivate fidonet, usenet is bullshitt censorship. Fidonet demands realnames. That really looks like a no-go to me now. And using only FTS standard stuff to build a network with different rules would be doable, but wouldn't help much because of its kinda exotic standards which don't fit well into the stuff we run today. Distributions based on the RFC822 message format fit better into today's infrastructure, so just install NNTP servers which are not joining Usenet and mesh them up with peers you like. Or think about using public IMAP folders, mailing lists, ... IMO lots of stuff looks easier than Fidonet today. -- I do not bite, I just want to play.