Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.www.mrbrklyn.com!not-for-mail From: Popping Mad Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology Subject: Re: namacalathus Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 07:03:22 -0500 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 12:03:30 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="www.mrbrklyn.com:96.57.23.83"; logging-data="6717"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2366 Lines: 30 On 3/2/25 7:20 PM, erik simpson wrote: > On 1/1/25 1:23 PM, John Harshman wrote: >> On 12/31/24 10:55 PM, Popping Mad wrote: >>> On 12/31/24 8:22 PM, erik simpson wrote: >>>> On 12/31/24 4:54 PM, John Harshman wrote: >>>>> On 12/31/24 3:38 PM, erik simpson wrote: >>>>>> These are pictures of fossils stumbled upon by my son and me. >>>>>> They're currently being examined by pros (Doug Erwin and Emma >>>>>> Smith).  We think they're Namacalathus.  What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.idrive.com/idrive/sh/sh?k=n8a8u1u6d0 >>>>> >>>>> It does rather resemble a series of cross-sections of Namacalathus. >>>>> Where was it found and do you know the age of the rock? >>>> It's at 39.084523, -113.715651W.  if that shows up in China, it's >>>> Google >>>> maps' fautl.  Just change the sign.  The age is from a geologic map for >>>> that part of Utah that doesn't have good resolution.  I'me pretty >>>> familiar with limestone from other locations, and the age is right at >>>> the Ediacaran-Cambrian interface.  It's the most easily accessible site >>>> imaginable.  You can drive to it. >>>> >>> >>> >>> url is broken >>> >> Worked fine for me. maybe it is your private computer. It is not part of the public internet