Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR--- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 21:48:13 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <27b6da57f540cd39d2918411d8c94789678e3f45@i2pn2.org> <24c66a3611456f6a6969dc132fd8a227b26cbcbd@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 04:48:14 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d75665534b29fc22cfbd837ef533f60b"; logging-data="474129"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PDJ5iYHg419ILrcuoWLFb" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:p9oez8OacfCDq0GYdfLcWh6l1yw= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250308-6, 3/8/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 4560 On 3/8/2025 9:45 PM, dbush wrote: > On 3/8/2025 10:40 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 3/8/2025 9:24 PM, dbush wrote: >>> On 3/8/2025 10:20 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>> *WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND THIS THEN YOU KNOW YOU WERE WRONG* >>>> Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and >>>> subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot possibly reach >>>> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally >>>> because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation. >>>> >>> >>> And when that code is not replaced HHH does a partial simulation of a >>> computation that halts, as demonstrated by DD halting when executed >>> directly. >> >> That Straw-man deception looks ridiculously stupid >> when I challenge you to provide the line-by-line >> machine code addresses of Replacing the code of HHH with an >> unconditional simulator and subsequently running HHH(DD) >  such that DD reaches its own "ret" instruction >> and terminates normally. >> >> _DD() >> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping >> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping >> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local >> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04 >> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax >> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f >> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d >> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04] >> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp >> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp >> [00002155] c3         ret >> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >> > > > Obviously when the code of HHH is replaced with an unconditional > simulator then DD will not halt.  But without that replacement, HHH does > a partial simulation of a halting computation, as demonstrated by DD > halting when executed directly. *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed* *WHEN YOU UNDERSTAND THIS THEN YOU KNOW YOU WERE WRONG* DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer