Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:26:57 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <vqk8fg$ooc8$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vqecht$3epcf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me> <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me>
 <vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me> <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me> <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me>
 <vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me> <vqii32$bcd0$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqijht$bcso$3@dont-email.me> <vqik16$bcd0$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me> <vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me>
 <vqiqk0$dc6s$2@dont-email.me> <vqirn6$dje3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqiug9$duqq$1@dont-email.me> <vqiur3$dje3$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqj2ab$dje3$8@dont-email.me> <vqj2pn$ef0h$7@dont-email.me>
 <vqj342$dje3$10@dont-email.me> <vqj3bc$ef0h$9@dont-email.me>
 <vqj3n1$dje3$12@dont-email.me> <vqj460$il72$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqj4mf$ikc5$1@dont-email.me> <vqj57r$ipa4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqj5k2$dje3$13@dont-email.me> <vqj6e6$j0t2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqk68e$ooc8$1@dont-email.me> <vqk70n$o4oh$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqk7ee$ooc8$3@dont-email.me> <vqk8a6$o4oh$7@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:26:57 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7cd4af0ac1547313f65cbaef3f65f1f";
	logging-data="811400"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QDJNcJvh2J2KF9CaKccAH"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i+/teaLOHFL7tbI5yMYaljqS1gM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vqk8a6$o4oh$7@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3828

On 3/9/2025 10:24 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/9/2025 9:09 AM, dbush wrote:
>> On 3/9/2025 10:01 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/9/2025 8:49 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 3/8/2025 11:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Erasing and replacing my words with your words
>>>>> is a real scumbag move.
>>>>
>>>> Not when you gave your official approval to do so after admitting 
>>>> for the record that they mean the same thing:
>>>>
>>>
>>> (1) Replacing my quoted words with your words (as if I said
>>> your words) is despicably dishonest.
>>
>> Not when you gave your official approval to do so, as posted 
>> previously that you dishonestly trimmed.
>>
>>>
>>> (2) They do not mean that same thing you removed most
>>> of the essence of my proof.
>>>
>>
>> If they didn't mean the same thing you would have explained how.  I 
>> gave you multiple opportunities to do so and you refused.  You were 
>> warned that failing to explain would be taken as your admission that 
>> they were the same and you still didn't explain, therefore your 
>> admission that they are the same was entered into the record.
>>
>> I'm feeling generous, so I'll give you an opportunity to explain the 
>> difference now.  If you choose not to take that up, your on-the-record 
>> admission stands.
>>
> 
> *When we assume that HHH emulates N steps of DD then*
> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
> because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.
> 
> Whether or not the correct emulation of DD by HHH
> is finite or infinite DD cannot possibly reach its
> own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
> 

So again, no attempt to explain the difference.

So your admission that they are the same and permission to replace them 
in quotes stands.