Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 16:50:22 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <20250309012626.00001276@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:50:27 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad095adaf9d64c9163b0578a2211f0c8"; logging-data="1038289"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Ovx6NJlpXfwElQCRedtyjSe9rv1Y7v60=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CFE/jEEQ4yD6gEH3fwdaStjDQFw= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2715 On 3/8/2025 6:30 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 01:26:26 +0200, Michael S wrote: > >> cygwin is very slow. > > I’m sure it is. ;) > >> For me the speed and UI convinience are far more important than better >> emulation of obscure POSIX features which is probably important only for >> programs that I would not want to run regardless. > > Unfortunately select/poll are a key part of efficient event-driven > programming. In the 1990s (the heyday of Windows NT) they tried to handle > all of this with threads, only to discover that, unless you were doing > something heavily CPU-bound, the programming complexity just wasn’t worth > it. IOCP on WinNT 4.0. Well, I used to use it a lot. Worked well. Way back in early 2000's. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/i-o-completion-ports