Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:26:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vqnedu$5hl$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <vqnd5c$1g7jq$1@dont-email.me> <vqndh8$6tp$2@reader1.panix.com> <vqne58$1g7jq$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:26:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="5685"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1833
Lines: 24

In article <vqne58$1g7jq$2@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>On 10/03/2025 19:11, Dan Cross wrote:
>> In article <vqnd5c$1g7jq$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2025 15:42, Dan Cross wrote:
>>>> So far, as near as I can tell, the only person who's actually
>>>> engaged with the proposal was Tim Rentsch
>>>
>>> I responded at 12:13GMT, but my reply appears to have sunk
>>> without trace. Maybe I'm not the only one whose response has gone
>>> AWOL.
>> 
>> It occurs to me that if it was cross-posted to n.g.p, it may be
>> waiting for moderator approval.
>
>Had I spotted that I was posting outside comp.programming, I 
>wouldn't have bothered to reply. It was an off the cuff response 
>that didn't merit the time it would take a moderator to sit in 
>judgement over it. If you see him, please convey my apologies.

Surely.

	- Dan C.