Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:22:16 +0000 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:22:17 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="24136ed51e51b7758cca36b9102b5d5f"; logging-data="1580666"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19w1jQoh1IGbI0Vj2/l/CNuwJVIpjrUSgAcAlvL8pbQvg==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nl5rbHdIwSgki3rWFWMPRYm8/xc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2118 On 10/03/2025 19:11, Dan Cross wrote: > In article , > Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 10/03/2025 15:42, Dan Cross wrote: >>> So far, as near as I can tell, the only person who's actually >>> engaged with the proposal was Tim Rentsch >> >> I responded at 12:13GMT, but my reply appears to have sunk >> without trace. Maybe I'm not the only one whose response has gone >> AWOL. > > It occurs to me that if it was cross-posted to n.g.p, it may be > waiting for moderator approval. Had I spotted that I was posting outside comp.programming, I wouldn't have bothered to reply. It was an off the cuff response that didn't merit the time it would take a moderator to sit in judgement over it. If you see him, please convey my apologies. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within