Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 13:13:07 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 22:13:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e72e54bf1123d47ca4084a40faedb0d1"; logging-data="346048"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YFPpFco+JufCWq/WVRUSmZCVFqVSqUoM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:kYuViPqv7RT5zqDx21Vt5n8Vo3Y= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3339 On 3/8/2025 10:15 AM, bart wrote: > On 08/03/2025 17:29, Michael S wrote: >> On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 12:15:42 -0800 >> Keith Thompson wrote: >>> >>>      GCC contains support for x86-64 using the mingw-w64 runtime >>> library, available from https://www.mingw-w64.org/downloads/. This >>> library should be used with the target triple x86_64-pc-mingw32. >>> >> >> The gcc compiler that I use on Windows most of the time has different >> tripple: x86_64-w64-mingw32 >> It is a native Window program for AMD64 (a.k.a. x86_64) architecture >> that generates likewise objects/exe. >> I am not sure about the meaning of the 3rd part of the triple. >> > > I think nobody does. There's always been some sort of mystique > surrounding 'gcc' on Windows. > > 'MinGW' supposedly 'Minimalist Gnu on Windows'. In that case I wouldn't > like to see the full-scale one.. cygwin is okay, well it's been a while since I used it... :^) https://www.cygwin.com > > My gcc installation 14.1 takes up nearly 0.9GB; don't ask me how much of > that, if any, is 'MinGW'. My view is all mentions of 'MinGW' could be > removed at a stroke, and nothing would really change: you'd still have a > compiler called 'gcc' that can compile C programs for an x64 Win64 ABI > target. > > Newer gcc's I now obtain from winlibs.com (ones like TDM are stuck at > 10.2). On that site, it explains something about MingW, although I still > don't really get it: > > https://winlibs.com/philosophy.html > >