Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:41:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ba5001e2cd57ad8e8a38dadc94bbc0186f56fb0f@i2pn2.org>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <votn1l$pb7c$1@dont-email.me>
	<5cd9bc55c484f10efd7818ecadf169a11fcc58e1@i2pn2.org>
	<votq5o$ppgs$1@dont-email.me> <vouu57$12hqt$3@dont-email.me>
	<vp1jkg$1kstl$1@dont-email.me> <vp1qp1$1m05h$2@dont-email.me>
	<vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me> <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me> <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me> <vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me>
	<vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me> <vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me>
	<vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me> <vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me>
	<vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me> <vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me>
	<vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me> <vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
	<b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
	<vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
	<a8b150912bc326cd01c9e9ee89762d12b9fc571e@i2pn2.org>
	<vpm6hq$2dvrs$4@dont-email.me> <vpmo1m$2g3p0$3@dont-email.me>
	<vpn9m5$2jkdj$5@dont-email.me>
	<a686628c3dd1a48f5dcb8288e69758325782daa6@i2pn2.org>
	<vpoqbj$2vaf3$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:41:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1992702"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3029
Lines: 25

Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:40:18 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation
>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation
>>>>> sequence long ago.
>> 
>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction,
>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,
>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
> 
>> There can be no correct continuation.
> I say what the correct simulation is.
> You say that I am wrong.
A call to an address cannot be followed by a different address.

> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.
Not a given.
-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.