Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:32:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <2c490daaadda4aa226b88ff0e98a1c1f4357cb38@i2pn2.org> References: <79920977-902d-4f59-a11c-497383221c82@att.net> <468b9c37-ba93-485c-8685-4b320e168251@att.net> <68bab5c2-50d3-43fc-be0d-51e01c5952bb@att.net> <862117d5-9944-4eaa-9bbf-040e376c27e1@att.net> <61fda474-8104-4e37-a1cc-d9fec975bdc5@att.net> <89d12ce1-5183-40f6-aa37-e4c1522fbc3e@att.net> <412fef253b0cce7487c30301e52aa8b3ae1bdeda@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:32:08 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="626721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 3555 Lines: 39 Am Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:15:47 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 18.02.2025 11:08, joes wrote: >> Am Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:02:53 +0100 schrieb WM: >>> On 17.02.2025 21:36, joes wrote: >>>> Am Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:40:47 +0100 schrieb WM: >>>>> On 16.02.2025 21:56, Jim Burns wrote: >>>>>> On 2/16/2025 6:18 AM, WM wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> All elements can be omitted. >>>>>>> The set can be omitted. >>>>>> The set is not an element. >>>>> If every human has an end, then the human race need not have an end. >>>> Exactly. >>>>> If every human has ended, then the human race has ended. >>>> If. Induction doesn’t prove that. >>> But it is obviously true. >> You can’t prove that humanity dies from the fact that every human dies. > Correct! But if every human has ended, then humanity has ended. No, the other way around: if humanity has ended, every human „has ended”. >>> Induction, as applied by Zermelo and others, proves: If every element >>> is created or described by induction, then the set of all elements is >>> created or described by induction. >> No. > Here in sci.math we should adhere to mathematics. Indeed. >>> Further: If all elements of a set are subtracted, then the set is >>> subtracted. What should remain? >> Makes no sense. There is nothing to subtract the set from. For every set M that doesn’t contain itself, M \ {M} = M. >>> If every element of a set is countable, then the set is a countable >>> set. >> What the fuck, absolutely not. >>„If every natural is finite, then there are only finitely many >> naturals.”? -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.